Another FSCO story of fiasco

One more proof FSCO has been ruled and regulated by insurance companies.

 

Here how does fsco response for a legimate complaint against insurance  illegal action.

 

Dear Mr. Ozdemir, Re: File Number 23462 We have now completed our review of your complaint against Economical Mutual Insurance Company that we received on September 3, 2015. This letter is also to respond to your Insurance Business Activity Complaint Form that was received by FSCO on March 18, 2016. The Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) is a regulatory agency of the Ministry of Finance that regulates insurance, mortgage brokering, loan and trust companies, credit unions, caisses populaires, co-operative corporations and pension plans in Ontario. To protect consumers and enhance public confidence in the sectors it regulates, FSCO monitors, investigates and when there is non-compliance with legislation and regulations, takes appropriate enforcement action against the sectors it regulates and persons who are illegally engaged in those sectors. As mentioned in our letter to you of October 5, 2015, FSCO received evidence that the matter would be heard in a motion that was scheduled with the Ontario Superior Cour of Justice on Thursday October 8, 2015 at 10 AM. It appears that your address has changed since your original submission. In your complaint that was received by our office on March 18, 2016, you state that “my legal action hasn’t been finalized still going on at the Brampton Superior Court of Justice.” /…2

FSCO does not comment on – or interfere in any way with – a legal proceeding that is underway. There is no evidence to suggest that the company is not adhering to a ruling of the Court. If there is evidence of this, we recommend that you refer to Court documents with regard to how this can be addressed. You may also wish to contact your legal council in this regard, as required. Given the information above, we have closed our file accordingly. Sincerely, Michael Manella, BA, CIP Compliance Officer cc: Christina Piperakis, Complaint Officer, Economical Mutual Insurance Company

answer for this cover up is this:

My legal action against insurance has been going on related to insurance benefits.
This issue has nothing to do with insurance benefits,now stop putting me in a stupid position,you already know what I am talking about.
You are not interfering anything,I have been declared CAT and insurance responsibility to make those payments for the expenses .
No w only option left to me to make a complaint against FSCO to Ontario Ombudsman by not doing your job and this will publish on one of the web page to show the world what FSCO means and what does FSCO do for consumers.
Simply you are annoying but nothing else,waste of time and you don’t do your job.
Who is paying your salary Is it insurance ,well insurance feeds you very well I am sure about it so stop collecting your salary and get your payments direct from the insurance only.
I am sick and tired of this FSCO protecting and working for the insurance only.
Collecting evidence against FSCO is involving this insurance frauds and at the end FSCO will be face with a law suit.
Thx for doing nothing but sitting and collecting your salary and protecting insurance companies also crushing citizens very well.

 

Advertisements

David Evans has been revealed at FSCO,working for the Unica insurance

Here is the Unica insurance last e-mail to arbitrator Robinson and my response.

Direct Line: 416-640-2940 e-mail: hpbrown@brownandpartners.ca

Delivered Via Email and Fax: 416-590-8462
Arbitrator James Robinson/Director’s Delegate David Evans Financial Services Commission of Ontario
Dispute Resolution Services
Arbitration Unit
5160 Yonge Street, 14th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6L9

Dear Mr. Robinson:

RE: ​Unica Insurance ats Sahinbay
Our File: 10909-208
Date of Loss: April 9, 2010
Commission Appeal File No: P15-00069V
In accordance with your recent correspondence of March 15 and 16, 2016, we enclose a copy of our issued Notice of Application to the Court for an Order requesting production of the Economical file.

Economical, Mr. Sahinbay and Mr. Ozdemir will be served with our Notice shortly.

It appears that the timelines for written submissions are now moot until a further Order is made.

The Divisional Court hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2016 and will be for the full day.

We have previously provided you with Mr. Sahinbay’s material for the divisional court hearing.
The allegations include a complaint of bias against arbitrator Robinson as part of the judicial review proceedings. When this matter proceeds to the hearing for variation/revocation we believe that Mr. Sahinbay will likely make the same allegations.
In accordance with the Insurance Act, we believe that any complaint of bias is required to be heard by the Director of Appeals or Director’s delegate only.

Page 2
A copy of this correspondence is being sent to Director’s Delegate Evans who delegated this matter to you.
As it appears that there is no provision in the Insurance Act to delegate the hearing of an allegation of bias from Director’s Delegate Evans to the same Arbitrator who is alleged to have commit the bias, in these circumstances Unica requests the hearing for variation/revocation be heard by Director’s Delegate Evans.
A copy of this letter is being copied to Mr. Sahinbay, Yours truly,
BROWN & PARTNERS LLP

Harry Brown
HB/Ie

c.​Mr. Arif Sahinbay (sent by email)
c.​Director’s Delegate Evans

Here is my response:

Fwd: P15-00069V – Unica ats Sahinbay
To:Harry brown ,Christina Pearce(FSCO)

What happened Brown ,don’t you trust Arbitrator Robinson decision anymore,doesn’t he get order from you or Unica insurance?
Who is this David guy? Is he the one who is working for the Unica at FSCO?
Probably yes,one of them.how much did you pay this David Evans to do your job,how many arbitrators are working for the Unica insurance at FSCO?
Yes we all know Scotiabank has so much money to pay here and there,Scotiabank man who is owner of Unica insurance.
We are well prepared for the up coming motion,let’s see who is going to be there master or judge.Did you pay them too?
By the way this will be publish on my blog to show the world what a mess Law and Law society in here.This David Evans or who ever he is ,going to be published on my web page as well.Thanks for letting me know and revealed the David Evans guy.Who else is working for the Unica insurance at FSCO?

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: Harry Brown
Date: March 17, 2016 at 2:57:16 PM EDT
To: “christina.pearce@fsco.gov.on.ca” , “arif_sahinbay@hotmail.com”
Subject: P15-00069V – Unica ats Sahinbay

Good afternoon,

Please see attached correspondence.

Thank you,

Harry P. Brown
Brown & Partners LLP
130 Adelaide Street West
31st Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5
P: (416) 869-0123 | F: (416) 869-0271
hpbrown@brownandpartners.ca

This e-mail has been encrypted using TLS Encryption format and contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named in the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communication was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message.

Bullshit society upper Canada David cass,Lisa osak,Tripta Sood

You will witness another illegal action of a trash lawyer Tripta Sood and Animals from bullshit society upper Canada cover up.
Complaint against Tripta Sood again has been covered up by bullshit society a.k.a.law society.
Second time illegal action of insurance doggy Tripta Sood deny payment of catastrophic person illegally.Here is the e-mails between from bullshit society and insured person.

Start from the bottom e-mail.

Case No. 2015-173781

Erol ozdemir
Tue 2016-03-08 11:06 AM
Sent Items
To:
David Cass (DCass@lsuc.on.ca);

4-)You shouldn’t handle this complaint ,I have marked that down to you to stay away from this complaint against Tripta Sood ,and your shitty supervisor Lisa Osak knows this very well,what kind of organizations you guys are,you are totally fuck top and this issue will be published again under your name and Lisa Osak name ,complaint will made to attorney general agains you,if attorney general doesn’t do anythink I wil make my complaint attorney general to ombudsman.I won’t let you idiots going away with this.
Listen man stop fcking around again she is doing somethink illegal ,that is not her jurisdiction or power to deny those payments ,that is something above her and she is doing it so.
1-My trip was for relief of my mental illness ,changing environments and seeing family helped me a lot mentally.
2- Tripta Sood has no right to deny payments of this expenses it is illegal.
3- money has been put aside for this expenses to use and I am free to use from this Money, as a cat I have right to do that ,insurance must pay this expenses and insurence has no right to deny it.
4- insurance pay first and if they have a problem with this payment then they can seek to go legal way to collect the amount back.
David Cass
Tue 2016-03-08 7:23 AM
To:
Erol ozdemir (erol_ozdemir1968@outlook.com);

Dear Mr. Ozdemir:

3-)I am responding in the e-mail below to the Complaint Form which you signed and dated February 12, 2016.

In addition to the information in my earlier e-mail, I note that you are now claiming travel expenses and that Justice Lemon’s Endorsement only refers to income replacement benefits. I also note that Ms Sood has advised you in her e-mail message dated February 8, 2016 of the means by which you can dispute the decision of the insurer not to pay for those expenses, if you wish to do so.

Yours truly,

David W. Cass
Intake Counsel
The Law Society of Upper Canada
Osgoode Hall
130 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2N6
Tel.: (416) 947-3300 x2440
1-800-668-7380 x2440
Fax: (416) 947-3382

This e-mail communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is specifically addressed and should not be read by, or delivered to, any other person(s). Such communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any use of this information by persons other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender, permanently delete the email and destroy all copies (electronic or otherwise) immediately. Thank you for your co-operation.

La présente communication ne vise que le ou les destinataires à qui elle est adressée et ne devrait être lue par personne d’autre, ni envoyée à un autre destinataire. Ce message peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou de nature privilégiée. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en avertir l’expéditeur et le détruire de façon permanente. Merci de votre collaboration.

Erol ozdemir
Mon 2016-03-07 7:50 PM
Sent Items
To:
David Cass (DCass@lsuc.on.ca);

2-)This is the old complaints you are talking about,I send direct second complaint to Lisa Osak regarding other benefit issue,if you guys haven’t received the recent complaint ,I will resubmit that again.
Let’s come to the previous one, the one you talked about,judge Lemon motion ordered insurance to pay me but that doesn’t cover the illegal action of Tripta Sood against me.How come you close the file without giving her punishment because of what she did,my complaint to LSUC wasn’t about the payment ,it was about the action of Tripta Sood.She cut my benefits illegally and judge Lemon decision proofs that she did illegal action by cutting benefits without court order.
You can not close this file without givin her punishment because what she has done.
David Cass
Mon 2016-03-07 4:30 PM
To:
erol_ozdemir1968@outlook.com;

1-)Dear Mr. Ozdemir:

Your recent inquiries have been referred to me for a response.

As you were advised in your telephone conversation today with Jean Innes, this file was closed on October 28, 2015. Because you told her that you had never received it, Ms Innes has sent you a copy of my letter of that date.

It appears that the motion which Ms Sood brought was heard by Mr. Justice Lemon on October 6, 2015, In his Endorsement dated October 26, 2015, His Honour ordered as follows:

Economical shall forthwith pay to Mr. Ozdemir the outstanding income replacement benefits that it had been paying. Economical shall also continue to pay those benefits until further order of the court.

If you have not received the benefits as ordered by the Court, you may wish to contact the insurer. If you need assistance in enforcing the Court Order, you may wish to seek legal advice. The Law Society does not provide legal advice, legal opinions or legal services to the public. You may wish to consult with a lawyer or a licensed paralegal about your rights and remedies, depending on the nature of your matter. As you may know, some legal services can be provided by either a lawyer or a paralegal; however, in some situations, you must use a lawyer. If you would like to be referred to a lawyer or a licensed paralegal, you can submit a request to the Law Society Referral Service by completing the request form on our website at lsrs.lsuc.on.ca. The Law Society Referral Service is designed to connect users with a lawyer or paralegal for a free initial consultation of up to 30 minutes, either by phone or in person. The service is not designed to provide legal advice or second opinions. If you decide to retain the lawyer or licensed paralegal, his/her normal fees and disbursements would apply.

Yours truly,

David W. Cass
Intake Counsel
The Law Society of Upper Canada
Osgoode Hall
130 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2N6
Tel.: (416) 947-3300 x2440
1-800-668-7380 x2440
Fax: (416) 947-3382

This e-mail communication is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is specifically addressed and should not be read by, or delivered to, any other person(s). Such communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any use of this information by persons other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender, permanently delete the email and destroy all copies (electronic or otherwise) immediately. Thank you for your co-operation.

La présente communication ne vise que le ou les destinataires à qui elle est adressée et ne devrait être lue par personne d’autre, ni envoyée à un autre destinataire. Ce message peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou de nature privilégiée. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en avertir l’expéditeur et le détruire de façon permanente. Merci de votre collaboration.