Clown was the same guy name called David Boulet and he was send there like there was no crown left and David Boulett is the only one.
Clown David was there again to protect insurance lawyer and I don’t know how much did they pay him for his services.
JP.was madam Anstey pretend like she was doing fair hearing but,at the beginning it was clear that they would not charge or proceed this criminal trial against those lawyers no matter what criminal action has been done by those 2 criminal insurance lawyers.
There are more then one charge against Harry Brown and JP has decided to go after one charge only “forgery”and that wasn’t even my complaint,my complaint was uttering forge document ,so wasn’t forgery by itself.Uttering forged documents is diffrent then forgery.
Harry Brown has committed crime by using those documents,whether he forged this document or not.Using those documents as an evidence is a crime and misleading Justice is crime as well.Here is the what criminal laws applies.
Criminal Code Offences
Making false document.
(2) Making a false document includes (a) altering a genuine document in any material part; (b) making a material addition to a genuine document or adding to it a false date, attestation, seal or other thing that is material; or (c) making a material alteration in a genuine document by erasure, obliteration, removal or in any other way. (3) Forgery is complete as soon as a document is made… (4) Forgery is complete notwithstanding that the false document is incomplete …
367. Every one who commits forgery (a) … liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Uttering forged document
368. (1) Every one who, knowing that a document is forged, (a) uses, deals with or acts on it, or (b) causes or attempts to cause any person to use, deal with or act on it, as if the document were genuine, (c) … liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or (d) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) For the purposes of proceedings under this section, the place where a document was forged is not material.
137 Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 125.
This time teather was little better but result was not going to change anyways and I knew this from the Tripta Sood hearing 2 days ago.
If those accused weren’t lawyer and let say they were ordinary citizens,what would have happened to them,I assure Clown and JP would have done everything to get them charged. I believe no one is above the law and no one should be.