Here is the cover up of the clown attorney David Boulet

1-What he says that this is the civil matter and has to be completed in civil proceeding first,what??

The law says for the perjury and forgery to mislead Justice ,prepare forge documents is a crime whenever forge documents occurred ,clear way is this; if you make a fake money (counterfeit)  law doesn’t apply when u use this counterfeit money to somewhere ,the law says crime occurs whenever this money is prepared,or let’s give other example ;you are cooking drug somewhere ,law doesn’t applies when you sell or use this drug ,law applies and the crime occur when you make or cook that drug.

2- The individual says that ,they need a court order to listen to the record ,if need it just get it ,it is your job and if it is neccessary to get the the proper investigation,this is not an excuse.

3-Justice Emery motion has no relation with this criminal matter,his decision was against the lawyer.

4-These 2 Justice of puppets are also under investigation because of same accusation ,they did not do their job properly ,they also protect those criminal lawyers by approaching and processing the criminal matters,those Justice of puppets can not be example or can not cover up the one mistake because they are part of the same mistake.If they jump from balcony ,clown attorney should jump too?.. What ??? this doesn’t make sense at all.What kind of Aristo Tales logic is this lol.

after all your letter is far away from satisfaction and putting a citizen in stupid position to believe this bullshits.

you covered up clown attorney David Boulet ass with nonsense  words.

MAG CLD Response – MC-2016-3743

Dear Mr. Sahinbay:

I am in receipt of your correspondence sent on May 30th 2016 to the MAG Webmaster account where you indicate you would like to make complaint to the Attorney General against Assistant Crown Attorney David Boulet. I am Counsel to the Director of Crown Operations for the Toronto Region, Mr. Andrew Locke. Mr. Locke supervises all Assistant Crown Attorneys who work out of the various courthouses in the City of Toronto, including those who work out of the downtown courthouse. As such, I have been asked to investigate and respond to your correspondence.

I have reviewed your concerns outlined in your May 30th correspondence as well as reviewed your blog. Your primary concern is that Mr. Boulet proceeded in the manner that he did in order to protect individuals since they were lawyers that you were attempting to have a private information laid for charges of perjury.

I can assure you that this was not the case. In essence similar factual allegations were before Justice of the Peace Quamina on May 30th 2016 and Justice of the Peace Anstey on June 1st 2016 and both came to the same conclusion — that process should not be issued. These are matters that are more properly first dealt with in civil court before a pre-enquette should be even be considered. I am confident that the status of the parties as lawyers did not affect Mr. Boulet’s exercise of discretion and that he conducted himself appropriately in these proceedings. In making this determination, I taken into account the findings of Justice Emery of the Superior Court of Justice in Brampton that influenced Mr. Boulet’s decision.

I am aware that you specifically request that I listen to the digital recording of what transpired. However, you should know that given this was a pre-enquette hearing where process was not issued, a court order is required to access the recording. After a review of this matter, I do not believe this is an appropriate case to request such an order.

I thank you for taking the time to write.

Yours truly,

[Original Signed by]

L. Jacek
Office of the Director of Crown Operations

Please do not attempt to reply to this e-mail. Further inquiry can be directed to the following addresses, quoting the reference # attached to your response/ in the subject line:


Address: Ministry of the Attorney General
McMurtry-Scott Building
720 Bay Street, 11th Floor
Toronto, ON
M7A 2S9


The contents of this communication, including any attachment(s), are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient (or are not receiving this communication on behalf of the intended recipient), please notify us immediately by sending an e-mail to: <>, and then delete or destroy this communication without reading it, and without making, forwarding, or retaining any copy or record of it or its contents.
Note: We have taken precautions against viruses, but take no responsibility for loss or damage caused by any virus present.

Ce message et ses pièces jointes, s’il y en a, sont de nature confidentielle et pourraient renfermer de l’information privilégiée. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne à qui ils sont destinés (ou ne les recevez pas au nom de leur destinataire), veuillez nous le dire tout de suite en transmettant un courriel à <>, puis les effacer de votre ordinateur sans les avoir lus et sans en avoir fait, transmis ou gardé une copie.
À noter : Nous avons pris des précautions contre les virus, mais rejetons toute responsabilité relativement aux pertes ou dommages causés par la présence d’un virus quel qu’il soit.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.