This is my comment of the judicial review of Mr.Best case

Sadly I have to tell you this truth ,they don’t let one of their kind down,there is no justice nor law in Canada when the time comes against these crooks.Court staffs are part of the crooks,I would like to remind you that judicial review in appeal court that they have pool system to share the bribes and they won’t let one of them down,the law doesn’t work for them ,the law works for ordinary citizens only ,once you make any single violation let’s say traffic violation; ticket and punishment comes right away.These crooks don’t hesitate of anything any nor one ,they are owner of Canada and other citizens,how many of them has oversees bank accounts ,how much money that they are keeping at their home in their safe or in those offshore accounts,let’s reveal these first.No one is going after these dirty business and no one is investigation this dirty business.Every Judge every low society members including law enforcement officers should declare every year their assets to the government and Canada revenue ,then we can find out and ask where these money comes from,and every judge houses should be searched for illegal cash money and their safe should be searched as well.
Let’s come the properties ,how did they get these properties ,they must answer these questions first.There are many thing to investigate,one of them is judge Drug Addict Lederer house and office for cocaine,I am sure that they have already revealed and found out the drugs in his blood and in his office they they covered this mess.Evey single judges law society members and law enforcement officers should give random blood sample to check wether that they are using any drugs or not,if they are doing their job under the influence of any kind of drug.
If I have got the power I will get all these revealed less the a month and result will be published with society.

Advertisements

Illegal motion shows canadian justice system

I am Ganna Gorovykh

This is My Written and only response of the motion which has been scheduled on December 14 2017 at 10am
1-Bringing this motion is violating the Canadian constitution Act and subsections of this act has been written below.Therefore bringing this motion is a criminal action and making courts or judges to be involved with this criminality.
2-I refused to be part of this criminal action which is against Canadian constitution act and my freedom.
3-No one can force me to participate in any discovery under this act as I am witness of the plaintiff and I refused to talk or give any testimony before the original hearing date and also I refused to give testimony to other then judge and the jury of the original hearing.
4-Bringing this motion for the self represent litigant’s witness to try to interrogate or contact with out the knowledge of the self represent litigant and with out getting self represent litigant’s permission is ;odd,far away from credibility and violation ethics of the lawyer who is behind this motion.
5-I am making my complaint to the LSUC against this lawyer who ever is behind of this motion.
6-Even though at the end of the motion if the judge decides for me to participate in a discovery(that makes the judge is giving illegal decision);participation and giving information at the discovery is still up to me ,
And I can simply refuse to talk. Rule says for the discovery they can only mark my refusal down and bring this refusal to the front of the judge at the original hearing and the judge at the trial only have right to question me the reason of my action.
7-For all of the reasons above, bringing this motion is nonsense and abusing court system and laws. I am suggesting from the judge of this motion may order against this lawyer not to bring any motion for any hearing from now on and for all of her career because of abusing the court system and the law.

 

 

Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part I, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Fundamental Freedoms
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
Enforcement
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Equality Rights
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

 

 

Legal Rights
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.

mother fucker justice Andrea from Brampton Superior Court of Justice to stay away from the case Canadian Judicial Council and Chief of Justice Heather Forster smith

0F8120C5-B78B-4F80-8ADC-D1864D0AF28B9F0B2D10-EA0E-48F6-A2AC-D0AAD87184E6C42E8908-3E83-47EC-9CFE-637D22FE8865CED26C42-06BB-40B4-8EE7-A6D8584212AF6B89AA14-4563-49F3-8157-CE33B2AC43D7DF6F71B2-7CB1-4A05-9194-D16A3E546A89D3EE68CE-26DB-4FAF-A25C-7E400D25A8ED

To Chief of Justice Heather J. Forster Smith. November 14 2017

I Erol Ozdemir
Previously I made 2 complaints against this Andrea guy,who is performing as a judge at the Brampton Superior Court of Justice.
This judge is going to be the judge on upcoming motion and I want him to stay away from my cases and my files.
Cv-114963-00 and Cv-113609-00
Perevious motion hearing I asked him to recuse himself from the hearing as a judge due to my previous complaint against him to CJC and his credibility of judgement,unfortunately he decided to refuse my request and he continued on that hearing.
He is the only judge who is giving illegal decisions and receiving bribes from the insurance company ,therefore I would like to ask you to make him stay away any cases related to me.
Up coming motion is against Canadian constitution
Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part I, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Fundamental Freedoms
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
Enforcement
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Equality Rights
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Legal Rights
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.

This is the reason that I am afraid the judge has been hired by insurance company one more time and will be assigned to upcoming motion by the insurance company.
Justice Andrea is the only judge at The Brampton Superior Court of Justice who is capable of giving illegal decisions or rule over previous judge decision,I already made written request from the chief of justice and I am requesting one more time from you and chief of justice Heater ,most likely chief of justice is involved with this criminal link and this is the reason that I am requesting from you to make this judge stay away from me or any cases related to me.
Copy of this letter will be also send to the chief of justice beside Canadian Judicial Council

Slut lawyer Tripta Sood and Bullshit Society Upper Canada

Mother fucker David Cass is still protecting Lawyer’s ass in LSUC

2E4ED2DB-1A2E-4EDF-9FEA-6C4C1E10F05B0C31438B-71A6-4B5C-8B8C-26DCA35AB23618E8D71B-9FB5-4383-BBE9-D9097917AD54AF744258-F52E-4EE7-97E9-A475658A5C06548CDC49-FBBF-474A-847D-466A03BFE2B2B1DA373A-917A-48D2-B853-F20885A26028

http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/newest-developments-blog—breaking-news—follow-ongoing-developments-here/former-rcmp-officer-testifies-against-criminal-networks-of-judges-lawyers-and-court-operating-throughout-canada

 

Former RCMP Inspector Admits RCMP and Department of Justice Know of Payoffs, Bribery and Case Fixing by Criminal Judges, Lawyers and Court Registry Officers Operating In Canada’s Courts

 

In a sworn affidavit that is will soon rock Canada’s political and legal system, former highly decorated and highly respected RCMP Inspector William Majcher provided sworn evidence in the Supreme Court of Canada that there exist criminal networks of judges lawyers and court officials throughout Canada who accept “bribes and payoffs” in exchange for fixing the outcome of law cases. (See paragraph 4)

Inspector Majcher also testifies, under oath, that the senior RCMP and Department of Justice officials “refused to investigate or prosecute the judges lawyers and court registry officials involved in the corruption” See paragraph 5.

READ INSPECTOR MAJCHER’S AFFIDAVIT BELOW AND please circulate this information especially to anyone you know who is being or has been screwed in Canada’s Corrupt Courts.

The link is here:Hi there, I’m reading filed affidavit of ex-rcmp officer william robert majcher – supreme court of canada july 19 2017 on Scribd and thought you might like it. filed affidavit of ex-rcmp officer william robert majcher – supreme court of canada july 19 2017 by api-28868571 https://www.scribd.com/book/354540177/filed-affidavit-of-ex-rcmp-officer-william-robert-majcher-supreme-court-of-canada-july-19-2017 Scribd gives you monthly access to books, audiobooks, and more – for less than the cost of a paperback. Join today and read free for 30 days. Find out more at: http://www.scribd.com/

 

 

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA IMPLICATED IN COVER UP
Inspector Majcher’s affidavit was filed in the Supreme Court of Canada to assist the English family persuade that Court to grant leave to the English family so they could appeal the outcome of a case that they claim was fixed by crooked lawyers, judges and court registry staff operating in the British Columbia courts.

On July 22 2017 the Supreme Court of Canada, in case number 32379 refused to allow the appeal thereby deciding to protect the obviously crooked judges in British Columbia and assist a crooked lawyer escape going to jail.

Click here to go to Supreme Court of Canada Judgment

0 Comments
Chief Justice McLcahlin Forced to Resign in Amid Corruption Probe of Canadian Judiciary.
6/14/2017 0 Comments

Another Dirty Judge on the Run

 

Canada’s Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin began her career as a judge in Canada in 1980 and she has been a major player in case after case of judicial corruption as one of the first woman judges in Canada, Bev proved that women are equally as capable as men when it comes to corruption.

On June 13, 2017 Beverley McLachlin suddenly announced she was retiring – but not for six months – December 2017 – so she can continue to receive a salary of $370,000 while she continues to cover up crimes carried out by other judges on the bench in Canada.

Bev McLachlin was made Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in 1988 by Brian Mulroney and was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada in 1989 by Brian Mulroney the same year that Brian Mulroney made Brian Smith ( shown in photo in left with Bev) the Chairman of Canadian National Railways.

Smith had no railway experience but he did have good credentials in the corrupt administration of public assets, and his directorship was believed to be a reward for services rendered when he was Attorney General of British Columbia where he was responsible for the conduct of the dirty lawyers at the BC Ministry of the Attorney General who were secretly and illegally giving a water export monopoly to W.C.W. Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd. The key lawyers were Robert Edwards and Jack Ebbels and they both died by sudden heart attacks……in 2007 and 2010 in what looked like deliberate murders…. to cover up crimes …..