I am Ganna Gorovykh
This is My Written and only response of the motion which has been scheduled on December 14 2017 at 10am
1-Bringing this motion is violating the Canadian constitution Act and subsections of this act has been written below.Therefore bringing this motion is a criminal action and making courts or judges to be involved with this criminality.
2-I refused to be part of this criminal action which is against Canadian constitution act and my freedom.
3-No one can force me to participate in any discovery under this act as I am witness of the plaintiff and I refused to talk or give any testimony before the original hearing date and also I refused to give testimony to other then judge and the jury of the original hearing.
4-Bringing this motion for the self represent litigant’s witness to try to interrogate or contact with out the knowledge of the self represent litigant and with out getting self represent litigant’s permission is ;odd,far away from credibility and violation ethics of the lawyer who is behind this motion.
5-I am making my complaint to the LSUC against this lawyer who ever is behind of this motion.
6-Even though at the end of the motion if the judge decides for me to participate in a discovery(that makes the judge is giving illegal decision);participation and giving information at the discovery is still up to me ,
And I can simply refuse to talk. Rule says for the discovery they can only mark my refusal down and bring this refusal to the front of the judge at the original hearing and the judge at the trial only have right to question me the reason of my action.
7-For all of the reasons above, bringing this motion is nonsense and abusing court system and laws. I am suggesting from the judge of this motion may order against this lawyer not to bring any motion for any hearing from now on and for all of her career because of abusing the court system and the law.
Constitution Act, 1982: Document
Part I, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances.
(2) Where, in proceedings under subsection (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that infringed or denied any rights or freedoms guaranteed by this Charter, the evidence shall be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
13. A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence.